Why are we expected to be quiet in an art gallery?

Photo credit: Riccardo

by Daniel Fink, MD, Chair, The Quiet Coalition

The Guardian has a feature in which a question is posed and the public replies. The paper describes it as, “The long-running series in which readers answer other readers’ question on subjects ranging from trivial flights of fancy to profound scientific and philosophical concepts.”

The Guardian phrased the question in the second person (“Why are you expected to be quiet in an art gallery?”) but I prefer the first person plural. I think it’s better when explaining something to anyone–from a grandchild old enough to use utensils that, “We don’t eat mashed potatoes with our fingers,” to (as I recently did) to an unruly 13-year-old boy at a party that, “We don’t run around here. There are too many small children and old people on the dance floor who might get hurt.” It takes a village.

Some of the responses were humorous, such as: “So that you do not disturb the still lifes.” I agreed with most of the serious responses, especially the one stating, “Being quiet is different from being silent.” One person thought the emphasis on quiet was elitist, but most understood that behavior in an art gallery that is different from behavior at a rock concert or sports event is important. As one stated, “In any public space, you are bound to a social contract with others, one that demands that you respect their space and their peace: this is what the quietness of an art space implies.”

Our noise colleague Arline Bronzaft has often written that not making noise that disturbs others is part of respecting one’s neighbors. If we all keep our voices down minimize and other sounds that we make — such as vehicle horn and exhaust noise, landcare and power tool noise or amplified music at a backyard barbecue or party — at a lower level, the cumulative effect would be a quieter world. 

A quieter world would be a better and healthier world for all.

Share this article:

Article Categories

Search Articles